Main Article Content

Nur Hikmah Fitratin
Dyah Ayu Fajarianingtyas
Henny Diana Wati

Abstract

This research aims to find out 1) Remedial teaching implementation using analogy strategy to VII grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Saronggi, 2) Differences of IP science misconception between remedial teaching using analogy strategy and remedial teaching using direct learning strategy, 3) Improvement of student learning outcomes of grade VII after using remedial teaching using analogy strategies. This type of research is quantitative research using quasi experimental design. The sampling technique used cluster random sample technique. Technique of collecting data using test instrument with CRI and non test method. The data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test. The results showed 1) The implementation of remedial teaching using analogy strategy of 98% with very good category and the implementation of remedial teaching using direct learning strategy of 91% with very good category. 2) Mann-Whitney test result of 0,017 indicating that there is difference of science misconception between remedial teaching using strategy analogies with remedial teaching using direct learning strategy. 3) The result of gain score in the experimental class is 0,71 with the high category, while the control class is 0,52 with the medium category. Remedial teaching using analogy strategies can be used to address misconceptions in students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fitratin, N. H., Fajarianingtyas, D. A., & Wati, H. D. (2018). PENGARUH PENGAJARAN REMEDIAL MENGGUNAKAN STRATEGI ANALOGI TERHADAP MISKONSEPSI IPA. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v8i1.32
References
Basri, I. Y. (2011) ‘Peningkatan Kompetensi Mahasiswa di bidang CAD/CAM Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Remidial’, Jurnal Teknologi Informasi & Pendidikan, 3(1), pp. 86–101.
Fathurohman, A. (2014) ‘Analogi dalam Pengajaran Fisika’, Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika ISSN : 2355-7109, 1(1), pp. 74–77.
Harrison (2013) Analogi Dalam Kelas Sains. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.
Herlanti (2006) Tanya Jawab Seputar Penelitian Pendidikan Sains. Jakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Tarbias dan Ilmu Keguruan Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Kunandar (2014) Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Bedasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Prastowo, T. (2011) ‘Strategi Pengajaran Sains dengan Analogi : Suatu Metode Alternatif Pengajaran Sains Sekolah’, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 1(1), pp. 8–13.
Praswidiarini, D. and Suyono (2015) ‘Penerapan Strategi Analogi yang Diperkuat dengan Praktikum untuk Meprevensi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Asam dan Basa’, UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 4(3), pp. 532–540.
Sari, E. R., Prasetyo, A. P. and Utami, N. R. (2014) ‘Pembelajaran Remidial Menggunakan Analogi pada Materi Mekanisme Transpor Sel’, Unnes Journal of Biology Education, 3(2), pp. 147–155.
Setiawati, G. A. D., Arjaya, I. B. A. and Ekayanti, N. W. (2014) ‘Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dalam Materi Kelas IX SMP di Kota Denpasar’, Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 3(2), pp. 17–31.
Subini, N. (2015) Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Pada Anak. Jogjakarta: PT. Buku Kita.
Suwarto (2013) ‘Belajar Tuntas, Miskonsepsi, dan Kesulitan Belajar’, JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, 22(1), pp. 85–96.
Yuliati, L. (2017) ‘Unit 6 Miskonsepsi Dan Remediasi Pembelajaran IPA’. PJJPGSD Universitas Surabaya, pp. 245–298. Available at: http://pjjpgsd.unesa.ac.id/dok/6.Modul-6-Miskonsepsi dan Remediasi Pembelajaran IPA.pdf.