ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI “GERAK DAN GAYA†MENGGUNAKAN INSTRUMEN FORCE CONCEPT INVENTORY (FCI) PADA MAHASISWA CALON GURU FISIKA
Article Sidebar
Published:
Feb 22, 2018
Keywords:
Penguasaan Konsep, Miskonsepsi, FCI, Gerak, Gaya
Section
Articles
Statistics Article
Article View : 1045 Times
PDF Download : 4092 Times
PDF Download : 4092 Times
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memetakan penguasaan konsep dan mengetahui miskonsepsi mahasiswa calon guru fisika terkait materi gerak dan gaya menggunakan instrumen Force Concept Inventory (FCI). Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan memberikan tes kepada mahasiswa calon guru fisika tahun pertama di Jurusan Fisika UM sebanyak 95 mahasiswa. Hasil analisis jawaban dari instrumen yang diberikan menunjukkan kecenderungan bahwa sebagian besar mahasiswa masih mempercayai pemikiran logis yang berdasar pada kuantitas fisik dan belum menggunakan konsep fisika untuk menjawab. Beberapa konsep fisika terkait dengan gerak dan gaya yang cukup dikuasai oleh mahasiswa antara lain gerak melingkar, gerak parabola, hukum II Newton, dan hukum III Newton, sedangkan konsep yang masih perlu diberikan penguatan lebih diantaranya gerak vertikal baik ke atas maupun ke bawah dan kebeadaan gaya kontak dan interaksi gaya benda satu dengan benda yang lain. Setelah diperoleh pemetaan penguasaan konsep dan miskonsepsi mahasiswa calon guru fisika, perlu dikembangkan strategi pembelajaran yang dapat menyelesaikan permasalahan miskonsepsi mahasiswa berdasarkan karakteristik masing-masing materi fisika.
Article Details
How to Cite
Munfaridah, N., Sutopo, S., Sulur, S., & Asim, A. (2018). ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI “GERAK DAN GAYA†MENGGUNAKAN INSTRUMEN FORCE CONCEPT INVENTORY (FCI) PADA MAHASISWA CALON GURU FISIKA. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v7i2.23
References
Alwan, A.A.2010. Misconception of heat and temperature Among physics students. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2010), 1877-0428 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Dr. Zafer Bekirogullari of Y.B.
Aufschnaiter, C.V., dan Rogge, C..2010. Misconceptions or Missing Conceptions?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2010, 6(1), 3-18.
Barke, et al.2009. Students’ Misconceptions and How to Overcome Them. Misconceptions in Chemistry, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3_2, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bayraktar, Sule.2008. Misconceptions of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers about Force and Motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 273-291, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10763-007-9120-9.
Caballero, M. D., Greco, E. F., Murray, E. R., Bujak, K. R., Jackson Marr, M., Catrambone, R., Kohlmyer, M. A., dan Schatz, M. F. 2012. Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the force concept inventory: A five thousand student study. American Journal of Physics, 80(7), 638-644.
Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A., dan Steinert, J. J. 2007. Interpreting Force Concept Inventory Scores: Normalized Gain and SAT Scores. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3, 010106.
Docktor, J.L., dan Mastre, J..2014. Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. PHYS. REV. ST PHYS. EDUC. RES 10, 020119, American Physical Society.
Halim, L., Yong, T.K., & Meerah, T.S.M.. 2014. Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions on Forces in Equilibrium: An Action Research Study. Creative Education, 2014, 5, 1032-1042, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.511117.
Heller, P., dan Huffman, D.1995.Interpreting The Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, Vol 33, Nov 1995.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., dan Swackhamer, G.. 1992. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30 (3), 141-151.
Hestenes, D dan Halloun, I.1995.Interpreting The Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 1995, 33, 502-506.
Hidayat, S., Festiyed, dan Fauzi, A..2012. Pengaruh Pemberian Assessment Essay terhadap Pencapaian Kompetensi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika menggunakan Pendekatan Ekspositori dan Inkuiri di Kelas XI IA SMA N 1 Kecamatan Suliki Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika 1. ISSN: 2252-3014.p 1-14.
Ibrahim, H. A. (2001). Examining the impact of guided constructivist teaching method on student’s misconception about concept Newtonian Physics, Disertasi Doktor, tidak diterbitkan, University of Central Florida.
Lasray, N., Rosenfield, S., Dedic, H., Dahan, A., dan Reshef, O. 2011. The Puzzling Reliability of The Force Concept Inventory. American Journal of Physics, 79(9), 909-912.
Maries, A., dan Singh, C. 2016. Teaching assistants’ performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties in mechanics revealed by the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010131
Osborne, R. J. dan Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A technique for exploring students’ views of the world [versi electronik]. Physics Education, 15, 376-379.
Rawson, K., dan Stahovich, T. 2013. Predicting Course Performance From Homework Habits. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. Paper ID 6848.
Risch, M.R..2014. Investigation About Representations Used in Teaching to Prevent Misconceptions Regardinginverse Proportionality. International Journal of STEM Education 2014, 1:4, http://www.stemeducationjournal.com/content/1/1/4.
Scott, P., dan Savinainen, A..2002. Using the Force Concept Inventory to Monitor Student Learning and to Plan Teaching. Physics Education 37 (1) IOP Publishing Ltd.
Tasar, F. M..2001. A case study of a novice college student alternative framework and learning of force and motion. Disertasi Doktor, tidak diterbitkan, Pennsylvania State University.
Taber, K.S. 2008. Exploring Student Learning From a Constructivist Perspective in Diverse Educational Contexts. Journal Of Turkish Science Education Volume 5, Issue 1, April 2008.
Taufik,M., Sukmadinata, N.S., Abdulhak, I., dan Tumbelaka, B.Y..2010. Desain Model Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran IPA (Fisika) Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Kota Bandung.Berkala Indonesia. ISSN : 1410 – 9662. Vol 13. , No.2, Edisi khusus.p E31-E44.
Thornton, R. K., Kuhl, D., Cummings, K., dan Marx, J. 2009. Comparing the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5, 010105.
Treagust, D.1986.Evaluating Students’ Misconceptions by Means of Diagnostic Multiple Choice Items. Research in Science Education, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 199-207, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02356835.
Aufschnaiter, C.V., dan Rogge, C..2010. Misconceptions or Missing Conceptions?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2010, 6(1), 3-18.
Barke, et al.2009. Students’ Misconceptions and How to Overcome Them. Misconceptions in Chemistry, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3_2, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bayraktar, Sule.2008. Misconceptions of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers about Force and Motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 273-291, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10763-007-9120-9.
Caballero, M. D., Greco, E. F., Murray, E. R., Bujak, K. R., Jackson Marr, M., Catrambone, R., Kohlmyer, M. A., dan Schatz, M. F. 2012. Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the force concept inventory: A five thousand student study. American Journal of Physics, 80(7), 638-644.
Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A., dan Steinert, J. J. 2007. Interpreting Force Concept Inventory Scores: Normalized Gain and SAT Scores. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3, 010106.
Docktor, J.L., dan Mastre, J..2014. Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. PHYS. REV. ST PHYS. EDUC. RES 10, 020119, American Physical Society.
Halim, L., Yong, T.K., & Meerah, T.S.M.. 2014. Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions on Forces in Equilibrium: An Action Research Study. Creative Education, 2014, 5, 1032-1042, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.511117.
Heller, P., dan Huffman, D.1995.Interpreting The Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, Vol 33, Nov 1995.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., dan Swackhamer, G.. 1992. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30 (3), 141-151.
Hestenes, D dan Halloun, I.1995.Interpreting The Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 1995, 33, 502-506.
Hidayat, S., Festiyed, dan Fauzi, A..2012. Pengaruh Pemberian Assessment Essay terhadap Pencapaian Kompetensi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika menggunakan Pendekatan Ekspositori dan Inkuiri di Kelas XI IA SMA N 1 Kecamatan Suliki Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika 1. ISSN: 2252-3014.p 1-14.
Ibrahim, H. A. (2001). Examining the impact of guided constructivist teaching method on student’s misconception about concept Newtonian Physics, Disertasi Doktor, tidak diterbitkan, University of Central Florida.
Lasray, N., Rosenfield, S., Dedic, H., Dahan, A., dan Reshef, O. 2011. The Puzzling Reliability of The Force Concept Inventory. American Journal of Physics, 79(9), 909-912.
Maries, A., dan Singh, C. 2016. Teaching assistants’ performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties in mechanics revealed by the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010131
Osborne, R. J. dan Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A technique for exploring students’ views of the world [versi electronik]. Physics Education, 15, 376-379.
Rawson, K., dan Stahovich, T. 2013. Predicting Course Performance From Homework Habits. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. Paper ID 6848.
Risch, M.R..2014. Investigation About Representations Used in Teaching to Prevent Misconceptions Regardinginverse Proportionality. International Journal of STEM Education 2014, 1:4, http://www.stemeducationjournal.com/content/1/1/4.
Scott, P., dan Savinainen, A..2002. Using the Force Concept Inventory to Monitor Student Learning and to Plan Teaching. Physics Education 37 (1) IOP Publishing Ltd.
Tasar, F. M..2001. A case study of a novice college student alternative framework and learning of force and motion. Disertasi Doktor, tidak diterbitkan, Pennsylvania State University.
Taber, K.S. 2008. Exploring Student Learning From a Constructivist Perspective in Diverse Educational Contexts. Journal Of Turkish Science Education Volume 5, Issue 1, April 2008.
Taufik,M., Sukmadinata, N.S., Abdulhak, I., dan Tumbelaka, B.Y..2010. Desain Model Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran IPA (Fisika) Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Kota Bandung.Berkala Indonesia. ISSN : 1410 – 9662. Vol 13. , No.2, Edisi khusus.p E31-E44.
Thornton, R. K., Kuhl, D., Cummings, K., dan Marx, J. 2009. Comparing the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5, 010105.
Treagust, D.1986.Evaluating Students’ Misconceptions by Means of Diagnostic Multiple Choice Items. Research in Science Education, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 199-207, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02356835.
Copyright and Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.